Tacoma added a new fireboat to its fleet this week. The boat is faster, more agile and more economical to operate than the aging boat it joins, but the $675,000, 30-foot Destiny has one thing in common with its fleet mate: Both were built outside the United States. The Destiny was built in Canada and the Commencement was built 30 years ago in England.

The Port of Tacoma and the City of Tacoma bypassed two lower bidders who would have constructed the new fireboat in Western Washington. At least one of those local boat builders, Northwind Marine of Seattle, is puzzled why taxpayer money was used to create jobs in Canada especially when the boat could have been built less expensively locally.

Port of Tacoma spokeswoman Tara Mattina said neither the country where the boat would be built nor the dollar amount of the bids was a consideration in deciding which bidder got the job. Three port and city employees ranked the four responding bidders and their products based on their responses to a request for proposals the port issued nearly two years ago. Among the criteria were vessel reliability, builder qualifications, warranties, training for boat operators and mechanics, the vessel’s quality and ease of use and the proposed delivery schedule. Each of the three evaluators could award up to 100 points to each bidder. Those combined scores put Canada’s Metalcraft at the top with a score of 268. Port Angeles’ Armstrong Marine was second with 227 points, Canada’s Hike Marine was third with 213 and Northwind a distant fourth with just 63 points.

In March, the Grand Alliance shipping lines decided to move from Seattle to Tacoma. When that happens in July, it will take about 20 percent of the container business from the Port of Seattle, more if lines associated with the alliance, Zim and Hamburg Sud, decide to go, too.

The good news for the state is that the Grand Alliance will still call in Washington. The bad: The state’s two biggest ports are largely fighting each other for existing business rather than adding much. For example, in 2009, Maersk Lines moved from Tacoma to Seattle.

Seattle is North America’s seventh-biggest container port; Tacoma ranks No. 11 and is soon to rise. Both are critical elements for one of America’s most trade-dependent states. The ports generally earn revenues from tenants that operate terminals and lease space, as well as from tax-levy dollars usually used for general obligation debt or infrastructure and transportation.

An Australia boat-building company has decided to open a facility in Anacortes rather than in Bellingham.

Last month Aluminum Boats Australia entered into a 30-day due diligence period with the Port of Bellingham to lease a 30,000-square-foot site at the Fairhaven Marine Industrial Park, near the Bellingham Cruise Terminal. According to a press release from the port, Aluminum Boats Australia officials said Bellingham was its first choice, but that the inability to directly launch vessels the size the company builds from that site added “insurmountable costs” to the business. Protection of sensitive salmon habitat and tidelands alongside the industrial park restricts the port from building a launch facility at that site.

The company found a site in Anacortes with direct launch capabilities, but is delaying its expansion until it secures a new business contract.

Earlier this month, the Coast Guard sank a 164-foot Japanese shrimping vessel, the Ryou-Un Maru, in the Gulf of Alaska about 195 miles south of Sitka after the vessel drifted for over a year across the Pacific Ocean. The vessel was dislodged in Hokkaido due to the March 2011 tsunami. Federal marine and environmental officials decided that sinking the ship, which had no power, lights or communication equipment, would be better than having it collide with another ship or run aground along the coast. “It’s safer to mitigate the risks now before there’s an accident or environmental impact,” said Coast Guard spokesman Petty Officer Charley Hengen.

The Ryou-Un Maru, dubbed the “Ghost Ship,” marks the beginning of what is likely to be a substantial amount of debris from the Tsunami reaching the west coast of North America. The Japanese government estimated that the tsunami swept about 5 million tons of debris into the ocean, but that 70 percent sank off shore, leaving 1.5 million tons floating. There no estimate of how much debris is still floating today. Many variables affect where the debris will go and when. Items will sink, disperse, and break up along the way, and winds and ocean currents constantly change, making it very difficult to predict an exact date and location for the debris’ arrival on our shores. A new NOAA modeling effort shows that some buoyant items may have reached the Pacific Northwest coast during winter 2011-2012. The bulk of the debris is likely still dispersed north of the Main Hawaiian Islands and east of Midway Atoll. Scientific forecasting models are only sophisticated guesses, so estimates vary as to debris arrival times, locations, and quantities.

What is clear, however, is that eventually our coast will be hit with some amount of debris from the Tsunami. As we move forward, some plan of action will need to be put in place to address the environmental impact on our shores and potential navigational hazards imposed by the debris.

A spectacular fire destroyed a 105-foot yacht at Fishermen’s Terminal before dawn today, April 27, 2012, just hours before it was due to depart on a 15-day Alaskan cruise.

No one was injured, and a harbor patrol boat managed to tow a half-dozen other boats away from the fire to protect them, said Kyle Moore, Seattle Fire Department spokesman.

The fire call came in at 1:10 a.m., and crews fought the fire with two hoses from shore-each pumping 300 gallons a minute, and a fire boat-pumping 800 gallons a minute. The harbor patrol boat also put water on the yacht. In addition, fire-suppressing foam was put on the boat.

On Thursday afternoon, the Coast Guard has suspended its search pending further developments for a 48-year-old man who was reported to have fallen overboard into the frigid Atlantic from a Boston-bound tugboat approximately nine miles south of Newport, R.I. on Wednesday. The man was the master of the New York based 91 foot tug Steven-Scott. It is reported that he may not have been wearing a life jacket.

The crew of the Steven-Scott contacted the Coast Guard Sector Southeastern New England Command Center at 2:40 p.m., Wednesday, reporting that the man was last seen at approximately 1:30 p.m. and that he may have gone overboard.

The Coast Guard broadcast an urgent alert to all mariners in the area and dispatched a motor life boat, a response boat, two patrol boats, and a helicopter to the area, searching 775 square miles.

Fumes in a building at Everett’s Everest College sickened 12 people Wednesday morning, Everett Fire officials said.

Firefighters and hazardous materials teams got the call just before 10 a.m. that people were complaining of headaches and nausea inside the college building at 906 S.E. Everett Mall Way, said Eric Hicks with the Everett Fire Department.

Ten of those affected were taken to a hospital. About 200 were evacuated from the building.

Seafaring work poses unique dangers that land-based work does not. As a result, American mariners are entitled to the protection of a number of federal laws that regulate shipboard safety and provide remedies for workers who are injured in maritime accidents. In addition to those laws, nearly all seamen – whether they are American or not – are protected by the International Safety Management (ISM) Code for ships.

The ISM Code is an integral part of the Safety of Life at Sea Convention. It serves a dual purpose to protect the safety of workers and protect against pollution of the sea.

The ISM Code sets a base standard that all ships must follow, regardless of the country in which they are registered.

Washington Gubernatorial hopefuls Jay Inslee and Rob McKenna are offering some ideas about how to bolster the region’s maritime industry but didn’t specifically say how they would pay for those improvements.

Both candidates spoke at the Bering Seas Fisheries Conference in Seattle on Tuesday, April 26, telling commercial fisherman, shipbuilders and others in the crowd that they would work to improve freight mobility and workforce training opportunities to keep Washington state competitive with Asia and others.

The Republican McKenna said he’ll work to lower the regulatory burden for businesses, open the state-run workers compensation program to competition, and boost K-12 and higher education spending.

 

In 2010, Congress enacted the Seaman’s Protection Act. The Act provides a remedy for seaman that have reported unsafe conditions to the United States Coast Guard, violations of U.S. Coast Guard regulations, refused to perform duties because of reasonable apprehension that performing such duties would result in personal injury, testified in any proceeding, cooperated with a safety investigation, or otherwise took action to, the seaman notified or attempted to notify the vessel owner of a work-related personal injury or illness. The following provisions set forth the text of the statute:

Seaman’s Protection Act, 46 U.S.C. §2114 (SPA) as amended by
Section 611 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010, P.L. 111-281

§2114. Protection of seaman against discrimination.

(a)(1) A person may not discharge or in any manner discriminate against a seaman because–

   

(A) the seaman in good faith has reported or is about to report to the Coast Guard or other appropriate Federal agency or department that the seaman believes that a violation of a maritime safety law or regulation prescribed under that law or regulation has occurred;

   

(B) the seaman has refused to perform duties ordered by the seaman’s employer because the seaman has a reasonable apprehension or expectation that performing such duties would result in serious injury to the seaman, other seamen, or the public;

   

(C) the seaman testified in a proceeding brought to enforce a maritime safety law or regulation prescribed under that law;

   

(D) the seaman notified, or attempted to notify, the vessel owner or the Secretary of a work-related personal injury or work-related illness of a seaman;

   

(E) the seaman cooperated with a safety investigation by the Secretary or the National Transportation Safety Board;

   

(F) the seaman furnished information to the Secretary, the National Transportation Safety Board, or any other public official as to the facts relating to any marine casualty resulting in injury or death to an individual or damage to property occurring in connection with vessel transportation; or

   

(G) the seaman accurately reported hours of duty under this part.

 

(2) The circumstances causing a seaman’s apprehension of serious injury under paragraph (1)(B) must be of such a nature that a reasonable person, under similar circumstances, would conclude that there is a real danger of an injury or serious impairment of health resulting from the performance of duties as ordered by the seaman’s employer.

 

(3) To qualify for protection against the seaman’s employer under paragraph (1)(B), the employee must have sought from the employer, and been unable to obtain, correction of the unsafe condition.

(b) A seaman alleging discharge or discrimination in violation of subsection (a) of this section, or another person at the seaman’s request, may file a complaint with respect to such allegation in the same manner as a complaint may be filed under subsection (b) of section 31105 of title 49. Such complaint shall be subject to the procedures, requirements, and rights described in that section, including with respect to the right to file an objection, the right of a person to file for a petition for review under subsection (c) of that section, and the requirement to bring a civil action under subsection (d) of that section.

If your employer has taken adverse action against you because you reported an unsafe condition, you may have a cause of action for violation of the Seaman’s Protection Act. Damages may include back pay that you would have earned but for the violation, future damages caused by your termination, and other damages caused by the action taken against you. Contact one of our lawyers for a no obligation analysis of your particular case at 1-866-377-0191.

Contact Information